IMGpapers 1980–83

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1980–83

Labour

Socialist Challenge No. 262, 25 September 1982 · pp. 12-13 of the scan · 371 words

The scan: sc-no262.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 1-1 of 6; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 12 of the scan

The first (which is still far from being resolved in the minds of some of the movements' leaders) was - who are our allies?

In the 50's and 60's this was a real problem. Particularly after the defeat of unilateralism at Labour's 1961 Conference it seemed that the only course open was civil disobedience. Inspired by the Ghandi movement for Indian independence, mass disobedience in the form of sit-down demonstrations WETE undertaken designed to morally shock the nation into disarmament. The police often reacted violently.

This time round the problem was solved in real life. Despite all the grandiose plans of the carly days to construct Tory, Liberal, Church, etc. secSocialist Challenge 25 September 1982 The first was to get stuck into the battle being waged in the labour movement. But here sections of the CND - parcuary that wing under the political control of the Communist Party, was thoroughly compromised. their reaction to the Benn/Foot divide in the Labour Party was to heal the breach.

And yet this division was fundamental to the struggle of thousands at the base of the labour movement to civil change their organisations in such a way as to win back the confidence of the workers movement as a whole. and thereby defcat Thatcher.

Insofar as Benn found himself opposed to the vast majority to the bureaucratic leaders Parliamentary Labour Party - so CND delicately balanced its national

page 13 of the scan

-шелов "uew 88147 pauad Aq p pue we "шен •UI SEM 5I1 SE DHOH *ZESI Kaup SABU are PeLorNaoe uospous to elels B поповіри: 1540 PaUL.

paraa InTA IRIE You saop II SH jueds пр ремра .Ie sn Joj 5,100g •ISEXO этом AuEN ay] uo JOGET -unq 01 pai same Aun! ареш dn pals:

SEM IU eSua polt *nodn HOISBALIT T08a 10 dols NO uaaq de Sapam pasos sd wrdo J0I TIO0 papunon pue j0 aortap элец 150g 453м Uolsenu! 2J3M Assel sapar pane iqnop inoge It pe euge SELIAJE Rene a jo tasa o UOISEND! Jo aul woIs sauddns PooT pue Sapuejs! элам JO PuE ea a111 paapu: weru •S1e0q SE 1153101 Photo: JOHN 1J0S, seasJanO тиаш WO00ZI :SBM 2DEJ tpjo apn 1011425 aup anssy pasn

----- pull-quotes -----

SH3H LN SONVH-

← CAMPAIGN FOR CND, Campaign for Nuclear Direct Action?Colonial revolution →

Something wrong on this page?