IMGpapers 1980–83

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1980–83

ROCKET IT INTO THE SUN! LET'S BURY IT UNDER THE POLAR CAPS..

Socialist Challenge No. 282, 25 February 1983 · p. 6 of the scan · 174 words

The scan: sc-no282.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 4-5 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 6 of the scan

programme. But American bosses have decided to back out. They did so at the height of the energy crisis when oil prices were at their peak — a time when the prospects for nuclear should have been at their Nuclear power had priced Independent studies in America have shown that electricity produced from PWRs is 25 per cent more exfrom coalpower stations. In Britain, the CEGB bosses have used every trick in the book and a few more besides to generation than generating electricity That's not just the view of a few critics. A select committee of the House of Commons, less, came close to accusing the CEGB of lying when it said that the cost had presented were *highly misleading as a guide to past decisions and entirely useless for appraising future ones.

The Monopolies Commission accused the CEBG of 'producing investment appraisals which are seriously defective and liable to mislead'. The Electricity Consumers Council accusLETS STICK IT DOWN SALT LET'S BLOW SHAFT INTO A STORAGE WITH A NUCLEAR BEDROCK BOMB!

← THE NUCLEARTO BREED OR NOT TO BREED, THAT IS THE QUESTION... →

Something wrong on this page?