IMGpapers 1980–83

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1980–83

78502 SAVE NEXT

Socialist Challenge No. 275, 7 January 1983 · p. 3 of the scan · 205 words

The scan: sc-no275.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 5-5 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 3 of the scan

Kinneil miners let down Scotland on the Kinneil workers. While pledging 'full support' for Kinnei and saying that there would be a stoppage of the Scottish coalfield if asked for by Kinneil', he did not call for official action in Scotland.

Kinnel was left to carry the can. As a result miners at other pits were uncertain what the official response was going to be, and some crossed the Kinwas able to build on this neil picket lines confusion to swing the delegate conference against action.

Now the NCB will turn its attention to other Scottish pits which are also 'uneconomic' as a result of the recession. The next test will be in South Wales if the money is not provid ed for investment. Miners cannot afford any further hesitancy. The call for action needs to be loud and clear. And it will have to be fought for.

Part of that fight will be to halt the runsteel, where another 5,000 Jobs are to go on top of the 10,000 already announced.

The line of 'action if necessary' to defend jobs put by the Scottish Triple Alliance is not enough Action only necessary and vital and that mea

----- pull-quotes -----

KINNEIL PIT

← Health dispute sold out - now defend the NHSThatcherism and military spending →

Something wrong on this page?