IMGpapers 1980–83

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1980–83

Fight

Socialist Challenge No. 258, 28 August 1982 · p. 2 of the scan · 147 words

The scan: sc-no258.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 7-7 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 2 of the scan

Underlying some of the reluctance to propose in dustrial action is the fear thai such action could hasten the end of BSC's Scotland operations Those workers still employed fear threatening their then fither if the ope or own prospects BSC in what they consider could be a futile battle.

The failure OI the STUC and the Labour Party to stop the closure of Talbot Linwood, the Singer plant at Clydebank and the Invergordon smelter viously doesn't fill the workers with confidence.

But steelworkers will also remember the tremendous fight put up by the women al Lee Jeans tory at Greenock and the Plessey Tactor Bathgate. Their militant action and the mass cam paigns which they were able to inspire in their sup port shows what would be possible if the full weight of the steelworkers was us. ed to stimulate such a campaign throughout Scotland.

← Steel closures challenge Triple Alliance and TUCWhy consultant backsthe claim →

Something wrong on this page?