BEFORE taking sides in any debate, it is necessary to get your facts right.
I am not questioning whether the Argentinians who wrote to the Times believed they were telling the truth. Unfortunately the history taught more like mythology.
The Falklands/ Malouines/Malvinas were alscoverea oy a Briton (John Davis) in 1592, and Were first called the Falkland Islands about 1745. The first settlement was in 1764, and that was by the French, who named islands •Isles Malouines, after St Malo, the British taking possession of West Falkland in ine following year. So France has a prior claim to Argentina's, but backs Britain's claim.
In 1766-70 the Spanish bought out the French and forcibly ejected the British. They renamed the, Islands *Islas Malvinas.
Was this aggression justified because it happened 212 years ago? I really do not understand this kind of argument.
I have never bothered to argue that England really belongs to the Welsh. I have always regarded the over WhO there first?' rathe childish. We should consider what is best for the inhabitants now, and fascism is not good for anvoody think vou are quite wrong to believe that any good can come of nan. ding over a defenceless population the eventual negotiations.
Unlike you, I would not call rebellion against repression 'aggressive.' It defensive, resistant, even if violent.
I agree with Tony Benn that the Falklands never belonged to us. No country belongs to the workers, and personally have never owned a square vard of land anywhere.
Shrewsbury As an activist within mv own branch (Tameside) of the SWP, as a supporter of the Reagan Reception Committee, I totally port any possibility fusion between the SWP and the IMG.
I find it sad that fundamental disagreements over our position within the Soviet Union, and our June.
----- pull-quotes -----
LONG LIVE SOCIALIST CHALLENGE