neon Sat prise to pulegtion:
Pe 8180. prioaio pebicaion don N1 2Xasgow), PO Box 50, L.onPOST TS The ogoo ind top. 061-236-4905.
Followed by voing social Organised bv RCL rickets &1 from Britain-Gr Socialist Challenge 22 April 1982 page 10
School. Clissold Rd
eakers: Diana Morley, councill Heae ave co So Mie totalis 218 Fire, Murray sireet, ( amder Town, NW1. I PURCHASED a copy of your paper last week to discover that you have abandoned British nationalism only to take up Argentinian.
'belong to the Argentinian people' than they do to the Britain's claim may be Taise bul areenula sIs nul much better being based on the fact that the islands closer to But 300 odd miles is a lot more than a spit from the shore Claims for all these sorts of islands depend on one ining — mignt. so lilal when you say 'the newly Republic of Buenos Aires secured Spain's rights the islands', I must point out that Spain had no 'rights' to the islands, no more Britain. It had tlidi "might' and when it lost that, it lost its 'right' too. I would have thought that Socialist Challlenge of all people would have known DCLLCN k of the also t ot you talk of the o1 dependence against Spain. Well, yes, no doubt it was good thing But this was war of colonists against their home country and thus has more in common AHCHICAU War of Independence than with say the Irish, Algerian or Vietnamese.
The Argentinians (that is, Spaniards, Italians etc) while they were invaded by Britain (in 1807 when still Spanish the Napoleonic war) and - as you say - trampled, on by Washington in 1832 were mnemnseve Cucascl in the extermination of the Ase nuldH ooulativll In this they were extremely successtul so much so thal they have minority 'problem' at all!
My solution for all these small islands and groups which are too small for nationhood is for them be taken over by United Nations Commission, provided as much necocu anu allowed to develop their own small societies as they choose. But suppose 'might OTEUSU Argentinian will triumph as usual.
London N17