IMGpapers 1980–83

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1980–83

ARGUMENTS for SOCIALISM

Socialist Challenge No. 234, 25 February 1982 · pp. 10-11 of the scan · 370 words

The scan: sc-no234.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 6-7 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 10 of the scan

take bagger quick.

ones soe oppression and Revolutio Hal Spent to all Sectatic ch inllenge sur Socialist Challenge 25 February 1982 page 10 BENT Bax 50, London ONDON TRANSPORT fractio of a privileged layer with its own interests against that of the mass workers.

It was this layer of labour artistocrats and bureaucrats who delivered the mass workers to slaughter. The interests of the great mass or workers, nowever, st lay with the socialist revolution. Therefore new parties had to be built to break the hold of the bureaucracy An opposing view was put forward by Karl Kaut sky. His most important argument - since it is still heard even on the left today was to claim that the mass of workers were just as backward and just chauvinistic leaders, He declared that the idea of a split in the working class was Simple ment was all that was needed to resolve the dif ferences which would therefore be overcome in the passage of time.

Lenin was adamant: It is a lie when anybody says (Kautsky included! that the THESSES letarians have shifted to chauvinism' It was the bureaucracy that was responsible for ruling class ideas in the labour move ment. They had to be driven out.

History decided the question. In 1917, Lenin's Bolshevik party led the Russian revolution in the teeth of the opposition of the Mensheviks. In 1919 the bureaucrats of the German Democratic Party drownin blood, using troops and fascist bands to murde thousands of German workers including Rost Luxembourg and others The labour bureaucracy is the chief obstacle on the road to SOME SETTOES. The only way to overcome it is revolutionary parties rooted in the working class

page 11 of the scan

happy to follow Eric Heffer's advice Phil's report also declares with some emphasis: 'the one ques tion of practical political orienietor dISCUSSPO the The report then goes on sion to the composition COnTErEnCE independent socialist intellectuals Most of As it happens there COCIST editor of SOCIAIST made a particularly effective controuton on unis point There widespread acreemen effective or appropriate way to do this at the present time We were mainly pre occupied establishing the society InSine and til late on the Sunday

← The need for a revolutionary partySDP is a petty- bourgeois party →

Something wrong on this page?