Here's a + HAVE been reading Socialist Challenge for the past two years but ! have never plucked up the courage to write to you before, because until recently a lot of the articles were 'over my: head' I did not think that. you would publish a letter from someone like me. But recently I have noticed that the paper has got a lot easier for to read and discuss Now to - fully support the Loe Jeans • occupation and I like the way your Duver neids me to the lads on the floor explain Photo: JOYCE A the way this links up with the struggle to get the troops out of Northorn treland.
I enclose f1 - probably a millionth of What's going into the royal wedding. Keep up the good work!
APEX shop steward, Lucas Aerospace, Coventry 1 WRITE as a member of Brighton CND; in a pergen Revolution Youth and.
I have no argument against Revolution Youth forcise, there is na But I do disagite with Rozanskis arguments Why should YCND follow these prac Having an age limit of 21 is a positive step But if you think there's some magic drink disrupt proceedings if it Sian questions whether ae assful as a aerence userul point for the oppression of minorities. wasn't a footnote I WAS intrigued by Pat Hickey's report the on 'Building working class power' (5 March).
He wrote: "The delegates came mainly trades councils, public sector, and white-collar in C1012 JODS waste of a day.' Is that juxtaposition coincidental?
1 was: not too umbress But with faimes the conference.
the organisers, it should be pointed out that the conference was called result of the publication dustry, which spelled our type •Labour government could be in power.
How to get from 1981 It was more how to avoid the mistakes of 1974-76. The illusions are being sown again that the That wrong thinking hat the conference trie to deal with.
article entitled Trades Council makes headlines, explaining how the trade council has brought about a 'flood of ideas and energy by buy ng a press, publishing pro paganda and the like.
Yet Pat Hickey argued that any perspective which refuses to deal with the national orientation of the labour movement and its leadership is 'all grass and no roots' John Parkinson, the secretary of Trades Council, seems to disagree.
It's understandable if the International Marxist Group takes a pragmatic attitude to the potential of trades councils, but don't slanaps have sinclar pick
----- pull-quotes -----
C Outt orie