IMGpapers 1980–83

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1980–83

Lambeth teachers!

· Socialist Challenge No. 192, 9 April 1981 · p. 15 of the scan · 542 words

The scan: sc-n192-apr-09-1981.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 6-6 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 15 of the scan

The pressure the Wembley drivers finally backfired, stana. to lose vamaole cus tomers in a prolonged strike. red reid tailed nok regional talks will le reduced watsons sentence to suspension while this proThe drivers have so far re mad it plain the sTal Watsor Cal COMe through it to go back to work Suspended Lambeth teacher THE executive of the National Union of Teachers decided Thursday to uphold the decisions of the union's national disciplinary committee concerning the suspended Lambeth officers.

The six NUT members nave deen susoenceo trom the union for six months. and are banned from holding office for a further of timise members who tight Ine CULS Talnel the Tories' education axe.

Support our reinstatement is growing On Saturday, the NUT ecutive was over 200 teachers angry at the decision to uphold the suspensions protest letter has been signed by prominent TOM Jackson Union of Communica tion Workers and Bryan Stanley of the Post Office Engineering Union must be a little worried after the 1 April mass rally and lobby of parliament.

munications Bill 1 lit ОПОП catch. were noping lor a peacerul arter noon speechifying MPs followed by decorous lobbying nsteac they faced demands over 4,000 angry and militant members 10I actor CUD cluding strike action' to kill the Bil They had to listen to four sponsored MPs tell them great detail what they already _ that the Bill would allow private enterprise profit Post Office operations, while cutting un SCIVICES such rural bosla denvenes The post and telcoms workers knew — and neckler. began to say - that this was the latest in a long line of deand that would lead to large job losses and worsening conditions of service of NUT assoc secretaries iations. further MPs including Joan Maynard, have pledged uner subbor Lam detr NUT is no allowing the suspensions continuing organise the same policies , building calmedic! against tor attacks the ano unrouonout the labour movement.

We want to be able to at this union that it's they and not Mendersare chosen isolate Have themselves the labour movement Copies petitions ILIA Defence Wheathill Rd, London SE20. campaion • BENEFIT Reinstate the Lambeth 6 Fight the cuts!

Friday 10 April, 71o 11pm Steel'n skin Red Rinse Flowers & Frolics Al City University, hortnampion sq., London ECI Strike against the Bill, say tion from the shadow cabinet tha Lue next cavour covernmen would revoke Ine legs anot and restore the monopoly, he s massively applauded on the pla:form answered thi questio of how to fight the Bill. whic: will inevitably get onto :: statute book When lan Mikardo said that it to wai: unt there was a Labour ma from the Moor was Tell that the cry from the floor was: to the miners Bryan Stanley, the POEL general secrelary asKcl members whether thes wanted action when the Bill was the House. whole audience Aware of the link between democratising the unions and getting a fighting leadership challengec Jackson to stand Ior ciello at the next UCW conference.

the fight against the Bill in al the Post Office unions. Brength at the lobbey and ol ovel Qi thei magazine Spark. More than copies of Challengi were complement on how to figh the Telecoms Bil

← BOC DEPOT SHOWDOWNGay trade unionists plan newsletter →

Something wrong on this page?