IMGpapers 1980–83

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1980–83

Central Wa

Socialist Challenge No. 192, 9 April 1981 · p. 8 of the scan · 438 words

The scan: sc-n192-apr-09-1981.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 6-7 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 8 of the scan

Iree. inaustrial acuoli lial wils Ul1 ing applause ine public!

MORKERS the line - and so will 6,000 railworkers this year.

New recruitment has been frozen for several months, fares have sky high, passenger and freight trains gone result of government policies.

MARTIN EADY, president IF LABOUR wins the Greater London Council in May, immediately Transport fares by 25 per cent. The National Union of Railwaymen supports this policy.

• An underground journey in London costs three times more per mile than a Metro journey in Paris.

• In the 1970s, £2bn was spent on public transport in Paris - four times the amount London Transport spent in the same period. Since 1970 more money has been spent on public transport in Paris than in the whole of Britain.

• In real terms, the average journey in Paris on public transport now costs half as much as it did 20 years ago.

Paris is now carrying a fifth more passengers than it was five years ago. Since 1970 more money has been spent on public transport in Paris than in NUR's London district council, London Transport and PETE GRANT, ASLEF, Willesden branch look at why rail is in this situation, what the unions are dothe whole of Britain reduce London travelling:

Which was due to comi • Since 1976 fares on the Underground have increased by over 300 per cent. In the same period, GLC financial support for London Transport has decreased by a third.

• In the last ten years, the number of passengers - by tube, down 15 per cent - by bus, down 30 per cent - by car, up 17 per cent • In Sweden last year when rail fares were cut by 30 per cehire passengers ror easeengers has in creased follow- passengers increased by 14 per cent. In South ing the freezing of fares. And this year not one Metro train will be more than three London Transport's 1933 stock was withdrawn.

Bri deferring the renewal of track on the Cen on:

(Tor beli gov the a U Ley 10S.

P years old. Last week, the last of IIIU wo per Lal the bus This results in increased sav BO.

It also means a reduction in safe WI lin inspector of McNaughton, at: derailments wholly defective track increased Nine derailments 7p been deliberately ma report states: thr of the various sta safety, a restriction in th number these cla increases, is of the bo M Lo cla

----- pull-quotes -----

ing, and what they ought to be doing. -London's down and out transport

Further USE of its present financial situation,

← Why trains come off the tracksRail boom in Sweden IN SEPTEMBER 1979, the Swedish State Railway (SJ) entire network. The reduced fares have now been in application for over a year, and SJ regard the ex- periment as a success in that they have recorded fy →

Something wrong on this page?