IN ORDER to provide the nuclear materials needed for the new generation of weapons to be produced by the Pentagon, a $3bn production reactor will nave to be built, according to a study by an inter. agency committee of the US government weapons programme in more than a quarter of a century.
Departments of Defence and Energy in late 1979, recommended upgrade existing production facilities nah River, South Carolina, Washington Post described on 5 May 1980 as the big- plutonium and gest weapons building programme the country has undertaken in 20 years produce new warheads for the Minuteman !!! and Trident I missiles; a short-range Lance missile; an air-launched Cruise missile; a new tactical nuclear bomb; a new strategic nuclear bomb; the Pershing Il missile; and the ground-launched Cruise missile.
is also proceeding MX missile and on a new 8inch nuclear artillery against missiles' CND if you have film.show demonstration.
public other anti nuclear event. please send ine details to us and CND Ta 01-58 22935 for det i. 15am Ms chard hoping, Tumorous 42 Gloucester Ave, by CND.
31 March: Isington CoD pub son MP, Melvyn Bragg, Duncan Clir Margaret Pitt London N7y of Holtay ki CND con throug called by:
Agains sian Detail Socialist Challenge 26 March 1981 Page 8 The new reactor would be the first built for the The committee, which was established by the an expenditure $500m to At present the US has three reactors at Savanweaponstritium the Over the next six years the Pentagon plans to warheads for the END de Ashese adan neaorth East Lynne Harrison 01-985 1030.
High Holborn. Assemble 10am March in Stockton (Bill Rodg CND, 12530pm. Tel. 0642244316.
Easter AntiWar Actions Goodwin St, Lon Regional marches Thyme Will Arches in sent or leath caer have as comprehensive a guide as ON March, the Reagan administration presented the US Congress with proposals that would increase arms spending $33.8bn in 1981 and 1982.
To present those proposals in the best possible light, at a time when social spending was being drastically slashed, Reagan claimed that the spending surge was needed to stand up to Soviet 'expansionism'.
In fact, in a 3 March televised interview, Kearan went so far as to state that 'it is rather foolish to have unilaterally disarmea, , you might say, as we did, by defence margin of safety deteriorate'.
ming, years military planners to provide the Pentagon with the means to launch a crippling nuclear "first strike' attack against the Soviet Union.
These were codified in Presidential Directive No 59, signed by Jimmy No Comment 'AFTER all that has happened, it wil! still be necessary to nave nosess.
sion of rifles, revolvers and shotguns. lese weapons cre primarily required for killing dangerous and possibiy diseased packs of wild dimals hunting for food.
*And sadly; these weapons will be niceded to protect law-abiding cominunities from the unwelcome attentions of armed criminal elements or despotic groups.
From Surviving Doomsday' by C Bruce Sibley, rublished by Shaw * Sons, price 2l.25.
Mr Sibley also recommends those looking forward it a bright new future afier a nucicar war to take the following items with them into inch miclear chelters:
IVelkie-talkie transmitters, cylinders of coinpresscel ill, special respiritors and protective suits, dosineters (for detecting rediation), ficid telephores and a big reel of telephone wire, small arms: rifles, chotguns, revolvers, signai flares and ... packets v seeds! Cared to the Us 1980, and leaked the August of that year.
PD 59 instructs the Pentagon to develop plans and strategies for fighting and winning prolonged but 'limited' nuclear wars. Its underlying thesis is that the would fight such a war by launching a first strike nuclear attack against the Soviet Union, crippling the USSR's ability to retaile But PD 59 is not simply words. is bacon. development four weapons systems that make a Frieni i woman launched first missile, the Cruise missile, and the Pershing Il missile.
With these weapons, Pentagon feels that eliminate the Soviet retaliatory threat in a crippling strike'.
In line with this, PD 59 instructed the Pentagon change the nuclear weapons cities to Soviet military targets. This is known as moving from a counter-cies a conniel in forces' strategy.
Although at first glance PD 59's 'counter-forces' might seem be 'humane strategy Occaust spares civilian targets, in fact its effect is just the opposite. 'counter-forces' strategy makes nuclear annihilation rather than less likely.
During the Reagan claims the disarmed' actually perfecting generanon or nucical weapons capable of knocking out Soviet and the bunkers.
The Trident I submarinelaunched missiles and Mk 12A Those warhead for the Minuteman Ill can now do this. counter-force implemstrategye To fully the however, the Pentagon needed it can the four new weapons systems mentioned earlier.
'first The MX missile, the Triof dent II from Soviet and the Pershing taken make it possible Pentagon hopes military nuclear nrst strike agalist ult Soviet Union that LargeLine more out Soviet nuclear forces on the ground and cripple Soviet abili ty to retaliate wo of the US's new 'first strike' force. Above model of proposed launch-plattorm tor Boeina 747 carries 72 missiles. Below, USS James Madison with all 16 missile tubes oper Pentagon more to $106bn, years that nerstone of PD 59.
US was 'unilaterally , the Pentagon wa:
threaten all command acknowledged strategy, needed for such strikes different sites, the MX previous missile system. the Cruise II will 6,000 miles, so the _ for the Us launch a massive destroy and-a-half miles. could wipe The MX system, which the The estimates will cost quired 1 $34bn and others claim will cost is the si the cor. As Richard Burt of the New York Times ex- guidanc plained on 11 August 1980, the range o MX will 'give the United State: Trident the ability, for the first time, to small m of the Soviet In t Union's land-based missiles'. launche Led as because enough tended It could also knock out fortified Soviet command bunkers. and ll August that 1980 the MX deploy The 'not on v is designed to escape a first strike, it has the accuracy Trident Ejected Armed with multiple war- the US heads that can be targeted to hit Navy al f6bi is far more accurate than any Trident each , each MX warhead The would land within 100 yards of system. its intended target, and would be laur everything within two- marine ground This accuracy and destruc ticularl tive power means that it could nuclear destroy the most heavily rein- so sma forced concrete missile silo. cannot
----- pull-quotes -----
$3bn reactor for new nuclear warheads
by in-