IMGpapers 1980–83

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1980–83

Little in the way of positive action at women's conference

· Socialist Challenge No. 174, 27 November 1980 · p. 10 of the scan · 411 words

The scan: sc-n174-nov-27-1980.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 1-3 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 10 of the scan

THE held special conterence on positive fOT women last week. the 199 delegates, were from unions, including the engineering union, the miners and the transport workers.

Two approaches have rd for discussion by the TUC. The first is LOI voluntary arreement.

positive drawn by The based on the affirmative acuull blu United States, is to go for a legally enforced and targets, number of women in male-dominated in astries Clear On the whole the delegates did not see those IWO choice connerposed. Marie Patterson chairman (sic) vomen's advisory committee. recognised the need tor both legislation and colective bargaining'.

It did not become, clear during the conference changes in the law delegates Vinny Dunscombe UCATT, La menoel Women 17 Manual Trades was the only delegate stress the need legislaShe argued for La quota aw ana m colecuve aerec ments in order to get women dustries This would involve DUSILIVC LIOn which Discrimination Act. Quotas Although there was uncertainty about the sort aCUOI pro delegates wanted, Marie Patterson managed there was more or less non or quolas The problem is that unless goals and targets are employers their employment practices, compelled Lowales ••WA job segregation will be very slow.

Socialist Challenge 27 November 1980 Page 10 Many people are opposco tackle it head ba it yet to tackle it to fight the suborlinate plac the WOrKLUICC ana LICES I OI I Dos ve cor are the way to do it.

presently forbids employers cally taking ICULCSS Tackie past discrimination. Winie the law allows peein, training management or the unions camor ser laraers ror serec. tion complement this. The net result is continuing J0b segregation.

How increase participation Ine umons look up a large part of the discussion at the lemands the unions, including specia alocalloll commitees. training, anel creches, were seen What each uras not debated out. for was not debated out. that was agreed was that a made Women's 1UL March To stimulate the debate. we should ensure there adequate reportbacks of the and advisory panels should be bombarded schools and thrash cola calc UU E DUSILIVC programmes Each union Ourille draw up a plan for how they intend to pressed for goals and targets be mployers. mean changes to parts ACL snoula not wal tor anote Labour government to fight for this.

through can be delegated to the TUC conicience Trater councils with over 1,800 affiliates are entitled The dead190, ana aclegales nave to be registered by 6 February.

← "H examines the background to the presentWomen trade unionists demand action against male violence →

Something wrong on this page?