IMGpapers 1980–83

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1980–83

Soviet unilateral

· Socialist Challenge No. 171, 6 November 1980 · p. 7 of the scan · 158 words

The scan: sc-n171-nov-06-1980.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 6-7 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 7 of the scan

ME MIAL

KAN LANK MLA FRED Halliday criticises ue vautant lendeny s ao peal to the sovet govern ment to renounce nuclear and to combination of a workers Illele alil the clas. CUllsciousness of the Western proletariat'.

I agree that the 'revolutionary instincts of the cul ocal WUlku Class arc not very strong al the pre sent time, and that 'hostility to the : Soviet Union is very deep But surely renunciation nuclear r weapons by the choriou west WOlC give tremencous soos tine anti-war campaigners fron which the as a whole would benefit Who many those CAIUW. associate leftists with the Soviet Union might be more to listen to us if could see that the Russians werc , Dervence"

No government can ig nore public opinion entire and it would surel! intent aga uesslve aransı government wnich naa re nounced nuclear weapons.

----- pull-quotes -----

Soviet nuclear weapons So viet union would have te

← Anti-Semitism must be combatted'are not defensivé' →

Something wrong on this page?