IMGpapers 1980–83

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1980–83

Three of a kind

Socialist Challenge No. 164, 18 September 1980 · p. 13 of the scan · 370 words

The scan: sc-n164-sep-18-1980.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 3-6 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 13 of the scan

PULLEY for President THERE's not much difference between the three main didates running for president. Carter. Reagan and Anderson all share the outlook.

Writing election manifestos for American politicians is a very tricky job. The main yardstick is that they should be as vague as possible and avoid committing the candidate to any specific actions.

But the sallic isn't present when it comes to which class they support.

It should be easy to spot which class Carter supports. As president he has masterminded the attempted invasion of Iran, eight million unemployed, and increased against immigrants and blacks.

But although Carter, like the other main represents the interests of a tiny minority, he has to have the votes, of working- people M order to get elected. canCarter same basic MX ruling CaSS Hissues bombers.

varucics.

Call ll.

host discrimination candidates, services.

So the ampaign is spiced with pro nises of jobs and a better life government opposes federal funding for jobs programmes and abortions for poor women.

Yet he supports the $34 billion sysicill. Reagan also supports this new system.

Anderson is against it but only because he prefers more concentration on Cruise for and long-range Anderson schemes They differ not on whether dependency' there should be military expansion, but simply on the best way All three can didates support NATO, and a American reactionary regimes them has At home they all favour more tax cuts for the rich American workers do not have a National Health Service, other benefits like free schools.

But none of these candidates proposes to establish such basic.

Reagan talks about 'fiscal and monetary restraint' to curb spending They •propose to cut the small welfare benefits that already exist.

The economic recession is now starting to hit American have Unemployment short-time working are increasing in steel, cars and rail.

Again there is no provision unemployment denounces such 'fostering All these Canoearer are financed and supported by the bosses. None of policies that can counter the threat of war, stop and defend democratic rights.

With 20 million trade union members, and three candidates who all want to introduce anti-union laws. it is becoming more has and, more obvious that working people need them own party.

← US election campaign hots up Pulley for PresidentDemocrats →

Something wrong on this page?