More on the F.I. please | IMGpapers 1980

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 2-3 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 14 of the scan

describes as 'racist'. Would you then write: 'With allies like that the prospect of Jimmy Carter becoming the next president gets more frightening every day"?

The unfortionate implication of the piece is that somehow Carter is a lesser evil than Ronald Reagan and the Republican Party is somehow "to the right' of I think you should be careful about getting caught up in the Ronald Reagan Neahderthal' syndrome since it implies ....... IN the new, improved but tain (edited) hopefully 'morerecognition that the paper is sponsored by the International Marxist Group, section of the Fourth Internatipnal (no from initials please still people who don't know they "stand for)?

Will it regularly constatemen United workerist-than-thou' Secretariat of the Fourth Socialist Challenge will we International? Will it refer perhaps begin to see some to the work of the Fl's other sections more than it has done? Will it perhaps ticles or even comments SCARIN on events in their countries?

I bloody well hope so, ROB' JONES, London

page 15 of the scan

toms and mechanisms of this study of the trivialisation of side lead stories on women's