character.
IT IS quite appropriate and that the government's new proposals on nationality through should be presented in a 'White Tories' main bring the outdated tonality law into line with recent legislation to curb black immigration.
Even the Liberal leader, David Steel. commented thai the proposals did nothing to remove the 'repugnant discri. bosses minatorv features of the 1971 Immigration Aét' which had separated citizens ana goals. Ai ts docs 1s 10 their divide them into sheep and (wo tots of goats ' Born divided the be according 'grandfather clause all Wiener parent had registered the Kingdom.
This lumped the whelmingly categories. żenship, The aim is to The content of the White Paper was almost a foregone/ conclusion. cove rents." and Labour + have :into sheep their proposals on nationality on Civil Service blueprints.
Labour's Green Paper of 1977 was based on an earlier .10a consulaive «ocumen and the present White Paper owes much to the rater The Tory and leaders share the same "non-patrials nroach to the issue. Both see the infamous immigration, especially black immigration, as a 'threa!' to KRISE CHiNTe born or tributory United and CLOLOI blems.
distribution Accepting this overwhelming framework leads them to propose increasing y ungemocra tie laws on immigration and immigration. nationality contain 'problem'. "patrial
Successive
Tory based :Green Labour apsocial pro-a racist the