IMGpapers 1980–83

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1980–83

Misleading advertising? organisation in Western Europary

Socialist Challenge No. 143, 17 April 1980 · p. 14 of the scan · 509 words

The scan: sc-n143-apr-17-1980.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 1-1 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 14 of the scan

I REFER to the advert in SC 141 (3 April) from the SWP claiming that it is 'the lar or North America.

The advert attributes this claim to Socialist Challenge.

Perhaps all concerned with this error would like to note that an organisauon usually classilicu as revolutionary, one that organises against the Spanish state, the LCR-LKI, a section of The roure nemanona s a least twice the size of the SWP(UK).

Furthermore the Fourth

International, an organisation present in both Western Europe AheNon Amenors considerably bigger than the SWP(UK).

I'm sure the facts will be noted for your readers.

STUART PAUL, West London in a rather sectarian way. The we sold proved that maly cobies women at the conference wanted at the editorial committee shows tnal ll is not a paper dy and 1or women in the trade unions.

least of all the IU UlC.

Socialist Campaign for a Labour Victory, would deny that there were problems with the conference; but the IMG offered only a one-day-all-women'scamma coco as c way forward.

Where does this fit into our call for a 'General Strike to bring cowa me oReso w a carnival inspire the thousands of women trade union and Labour rantv mendes. voul. ard housewives who don't identify with the women's liberation moveren wia about wonen isolated in low-paid, non-unionised labour?

Thone the IMG will build the next Fightback conference in an open ana energetic way snoula argue ror a non-aciegate, broadly-based conference and we democratic government and went utilized in order to unite all the workers for defence, for selfprotection, even if, a vcy muucsl icootalce soil proved favourable, had the agitation met with a favourable response. it would then have been possible to pass over to the The revolutionary party would gain by this because it would have CUASS •oo• expenses involved in safety measures to begin with, unions.

Had the harassed.

not-too impressive either.

overalors work lorelnc ' (My emphasis) internationally, Fi.. A NEW UNIFORM..

Finally, the editorial is far too simplistic in its treatment of the Madrid.

Yes, organisers have been But the record of unhindered organising on rigs is The fact that the North Sea oil while the unions fiercely guard their national and trade structures, ues tne lanas ol ••WORN BENESOTATING the PNV attempts to increase contro ame sice o ane cake are expense of its natural allies in Meanwhile the Socialist and Communist Parties have continued to disregard the fight tor set-determinanon ane retus to participate in the fight against repression. Instead , they nav concentrated their fire on ETA at a time of unprecedented murders and agression by the fascists

OH WELL -ANTHING'S

BETTER THAN HAYNG TO STRUGGLE!

Protestants (as opposed to LOvaNI Irish feminists, when we visited Armagh that weekend, rather than lecture women on the 'correct position on Ireland' as Emma and Charlie seem to wish to co. exonine now awa impossible to build a strong united women's movement in re ana wimon controne tie border between the North and the South, without confronting the

← France: Campaign for workers' unity wins wide supportLittle to offer? →

Something wrong on this page?